Tuesday, May 7, 2013

37. ALPHA AND OMEGA - THE BEGINNING AND THE END

37. ALPHA AND OMEGA - THE BEGINNING AND THE END



Revelation 1:8. Alpha and Omega: I am Alpha and Omega.”
This utterance, the first of the utterances of God in the Book of Revelation, seems to be saying, not only the awesome title “I Am,” but also that “I Am the Alphabet,” since alpha and omega are the names of the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet. This is a puzzling statement unless and until we understand the significance of the alphabet as it is used in this context.[i]
The alphabet is a fit symbol of Christ for it is both human and divine. From its earthly mother it inherits its practical, utilitarian and mathematical nature; from God the Father of it and all other Lights, it inherits its generative powers to reproduce spiritual things: Wisdom, Truth, Beauty, Inspiration, Faith, Hope, and Charity.
We must receive this revelation of Christ by examining the words in their context. The context must not be sought in the later speculations of Pharisaic Judaism.[ii] The usage in the Book of Revelation is not related to the later mystical writings of the Gnostics nor the magical writings of the Kabbalists.[iii] [Kabbalah (Cabalah) is the system of magical, occult practices, using the Hebrew alphabet for witchcraft and other occult practices in Judaism.] We must rather look to the canonical Scriptures and to the historical and cultural milieu preceding and during the time of the writing of the Book of Revelation. We totally reject the occult use of the alphabet as practiced by the Kabbalists even today.
Based upon the premise that the book was originally written in Hebrew, we should translate the alphabetic terms back to the Hebrew. The equivalent of alpha and omega in Hebrew is aleph and tau. The aleph and tau, being the first and last letters, represents the entire alphabet and is no doubt the Hebrew word for alphabet. The word we translate and is represented in Hebrew by the letter vau, giving us the three letters aleph, vau, and tau. These three letters, so arranged, spell the word translated sign, or transliterated ’ôwth, or the alternate shortened spelling ’ôth.[iv]
We may readily see that as aleph-vau-tau Christ is the totality of every word that may be uttered, written, or read. He is The Word. However, there are aspects of the ancient alphabet that are difficult to translate. One of those is the fact that the oldest alphabets were not only letters, but were also numerals. As the numerals, Christ is the entire realm of all that can be measured or quantified, that is, all mathematics and science. But this is not yet all that the term aleph-vau-tau indicates, for in the earliest traceable stages, the alphabet was also the means of designating the time-telling stars and constellations in their time-telling movements as well as their function in navigation and cartography, (Seiss, 177).[v] 
Even now there is a system for naming stars that uses the Greek alphabet – roughly in order of their brightness within a constellation: alpha, beta, gamma, … etc. To sum it up, as aleph-vau-tau, Christ is All and in All: The Word, Time, Space, Wisdom, Life.
Origen in his Commentary said that the canonical books of the Hebrew Bible were twenty-two, “like the letters of their alphabet.”[vi] This was a fact noted also by Josephus and other writers of that era. It indicates that they considered the alphabet as representing a totality; that is, the complete Scriptures were contained in the twenty-two letters of the alphabet.
The Semitic alphabet has spread throughout the world to many languages and cultures Consequently, it has been used in multitudes of ways and has followed various lines of development. Much of the original idea of the alphabet has been lost in some of its lines of transmission. Here I will try to show what the original alphabetic idea is in the canonical Scriptures and how it is used as a fit symbol of Christ in that context.
The Word ’Oth (Aleph-Vau-Tau)
In Genesis 1:14 we have the account of the creation of signs. The lights of the heavens, the sun, moon, and stars were created for signs, ’othoth, plural of ᾽oth.  This plural represents the grouping, or pluralizing of the alphabetic signs, creating the constellations.  These signs were for two purposes: to mark time, designating the times and seasons, and to give light, separating the light from the darkness, (Gen. 1:14). From the creation, the signs, the aleph ve tau, the alphabet, was intended to be both numerals and letters witnessing to and symbolizing the Logos of the Most High God.[vii]
As time markers, they fulfilled a numeric function, to mark day and night and the seasons of the year. As light-givers they were to fulfill a literary and artistic function: to give Light on the earth and to separate Light from darkness physically, and wisdom from ignorance intellectually. The original alphabet represented these two distinct rays, the numerical, which first found expression in the time-reckoning function and later in other mathematical uses, and the linguistic, expressed in writing. At this first stage it should perhaps be called the “numero/alphabet.” The original idea of the numero/alphabet represented the idea of order.
As signs, these highest of all symbols, were created as a witness of and to the Most High God, to teach and to inspire worship. We should therefore not wonder that they have been prostituted to idol worship throughout history in many cultures of the world. That is all the more reason we should appropriate them, as symbols, to the worship of Christ, their legitimate and intended use.
But the plural form, ’othoth, may be a reduplication of the form which was already intended to be a plural; that is, the original root may have simply been the single letter aleph. Adding the feminine plural morpheme –oth would make the word mean “plural aleph(im).” Sometime later, however, the form came to be understood as a singular and a reduplicated plural morpheme –oth was added. Such reduplications are attested many times in historical linguistics.
If this be the case, the original aleph would have had the meaning “sign,” and its plural would have been “signs.”  The original plural, then, aleph ve tau, would have indicated the signs of the alphabet, from aleph, the first letter, to tau the last letter.  The word ᾽oth would therefore mean “the alphabet as signs.”
Evidence that this was indeed the case comes from the form ᾽au and tau both of which mean “a sign, mark.”  The original plural of aleph then was the feminine form ’oth and the original of tau was the masculine tam meaning “finished, complete.” The aleph began the circle and the tam completed the circle at the same point, making aleph ve tau the description of a single point of the completed circle, and thus of the circle itself, the complete alphabet. This is clearly what Christ meant when He said: “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending”; that is, that the ending and the beginning were one and the same point.[viii] Christ became the overlapping anchor between the “this age” and “the age to come.” 2 Esdras 6:7 shows that the “dividing of times” means “the end of the first age and the beginning of the age that follows.”
Seiss says that, due to the proclivity of the Jews to idolatrous worship of the heavenly bodies, all the figures of the zodiac were erased and the Hebrew alphabet was substituted in their place, (p. 177). Seiss’ view is perhaps an anachronism, for the more likely scenario was that the zodiac signs were from the creation first designated by the Hebrew alphabet and only when the Hebrews fell into idol worship did they use the signs of the Greek zodiac, the circle of animals. In other words, the Greed zodiac was a later development of what was originally the Hebrew alphabet.
Some history of the alphabet will help to demonstrate its significance as a symbol of Christ. The alphabet did not originate as the phonetic system we have today which roughly represents speech sounds. It had a long history before it reached the phonetic stage of development. As the handwriting of God upon the heavens, it was universally significant to all mankind. Being able to read the signs of the heavens and to know the seasons was a matter of life or death as well as a spiritual experience. Having already acquired this basic significance, it was ideally suited to go into the whole world when it developed into a phonetic system.
The primal idea of the alphabet was that of an immutable order, an order witnessed to by the order of the time-indicating signs of the heavens. Possibly the first use of the graphic symbols of the alphabet was as numerals for counting and naming this ordered series of the progression of time-indicators, the sun, moon and constellations for time-reckoning, that is, the days, months and years, for example, “day one,” “day two,” as in Genesis chapter one.
As symbols of order, it consequently became a mnemonic device for memory units of all kinds.[ix] In time the mnemonic use of these signs for oral literary and historical units developed into semasiographic writing,[x] which, at some point, produced the idea of correlating the signs with speech sounds. At this point the alphabet became phonetic as we know it today.[xi]
The major steps in the history of the development of the alphabet as it progressed through a continual differentiation of usage, meaning, and signs is somewhat parallel to the ever-increasing Light of Christ.


[i] See also my Commentary on Revelation 1:7, “Coming.” In the Hebrew alphabet the first letter is called Aleph and the last letter is called Tau. The Hebrew word ’ôwth, (consisting of the letters aleph-vau-tau,), is used in Dan.7:13 regarding the “coming” of the Son of Man in the clouds.
[ii] The modern shameful misuse of the Scriptures in the so-called "Omega Code" take their ideas from the Jewish misuse of the alphabet. For example among the non-canonical apocalyptic writings are the Alphabets of Rabbi Akiba, about 1100 AD:
“Apocalyptic Literature, 6. The Alphabets of R. Akiba,"( 680-1). "The chief center of thought of all of them [i.e. the Alphabets,] is the mystical signification, already mentioned in the Talmud, of the letters of the alphabet and of their written forms, and the mysteries of the names of God made up of four, twelve, and forty-two letters. In the Jerusalem Talmud (Hagigah.ii.77c) there is a dissertation on the letters by means of which the world was created, and there, as in these writings, it is stated that the present world was created with He (ה) and the future with Yod (י), and eschatological theories are built up out of the forms of these letters. 
“In the Babylonian Talmud (Shabbath. 104a), also, all sorts of similar interpretations are given in regard to the names, forms, and combinations of the various letters, and are made to bear upon eschatological questions in the same way as in these apocalypses. In Kiddushin 71a, it is said that the mysteries of the three names of God were treated as esoteric doctrine and that whoever became thoroughly initiated into the mystery of the name consisting of forty-two letters might be sure of inheriting both the present and the future world. Similarly, R. Akiba, the reputed author of the “Alphabets,” is especially commended in the Talmud as interpreter of the strokes, dots, and flourishes of the letters (compare, for example, Men. 29b; see also Akiba Ben Joseph),” Jewish Encyclopedia, JE, Vol 1 KTAV Publishing House, Inc., New York, 1901. (Prepared by more than 400 scholars and specialists.) Isodore Singer, project and managing editor.
   Some scholars attempt to show that these "Alphabets" borrow their theosophical speculation from the writings of Islam, ("especially in “Monatschrift,” viii.115 et seq."), however:
"Later Jewish literature had the widest and deepest influence on the formation and development of the views and teachings of Islam .... From the presence of mystical speculations about the essence and being of God, etc., in the Arabic literature, similar to those in the Neo-Hebrew, it is quite impossible to conclude that they found their way from the former into the latter; rather would the opposite conclusion be justified," (ibid.).
In other words, Islam's Koran took much of its teachings from the Jewish Talmud.
[iii] See "Kabbalah (Cabalah)" and "Zohar", The New Jewish Encyclopedia, Revised edition, eds. David Bridger, Samuel Wolk, (Behrman House, Inc., Publisher. 1976). 
[iv] See Commentary at 9:11 “The Hebrew Tongue” also at 16:16 “Armageddon.”  The texts considered sacred to Judaism are as follows:
Targumim = “translations.”
The Babli is the Babylonian Talmud and the Yerushalmi is the Jerusalem Talmud.
Midrash is: (1) the haggadic or halakic exposition of the underlying significance of a Bible text.  (2) A collection of Midrashim. (3) cap: the Midrashic literature written between the 4th century BC and 11th century AD.
Haggadah is: (1) ancient Jewish lore forming esp. the nonlegal part of the Talmud.  (2) The Jewish ritual for the Seder, (Passover feast).
Halakah is the body of Jewish law supplementing the Scriptural law and forming especially the legal part of the Talmud.  Judaism considers the New Testament and Christianity as heretical.
[v] "In the perspective of early Christians who compiled listings of heretics, Israelites who rejected Jesus as Messiah were quintessential heretics. Among this group, the Pharisees were remembered for their devotedness to astrology: 'Fate and astrology were quite popular notions with them,' writes Epiphanius....  Epiphanius further recounts how they possessed a vocabulary of their own in Hebrew for the zodiac and other celestial beings," (Malina, 74).
[vi] As stated by Eusebius, History of the Church, 6.25; that the Apostle John wrote the Book of Revelation (ibid.  6:25.10).
[vii] It could well be argued that this heavenly Pattern is the written Name of God. Its incorporation into the Temple meant that God's Name was there. That is, the Temple was created and designed for the purpose of an observatory of the heavenly Pattern telling the times and seasons and teaching the wisdom of God. See also my Commentary at 1:3 "Christ as Light and Time."

[viii] The KJV includes the phrase "the beginning and the ending" but this is at the translator’s privilege for it was not in the original Greek. The KJV translators felt it was necessary in order to bring out the sense of the verse. The RSV leaves out the phrase "the beginning and the ending" here but includes it at Revelation 21:6 and 22:13 where the saying is repeated, see "First and Last" my Commentary on 1:17.

 [ix] A mnemonic device is a system used to recall the proper order of items in a sequence; i.e. any group of items to be remembered could be arranged according to this fixed numero/alphabetic order and so be more easily recalled.
[x] Semasiographic writing is defined by Gelb as "… a stage of writing in which meaning– not words or sounds– are suggested by signs," Ignace J. Gelb, A Study of Writing: The Foundations of Grammatology, Second Edition, (Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press, 1962), 15.
[xi] The Behaviourist School says that language is the only medium of human communication and all human intercommunication outside of language is nothing but a secondary substitute for language, that thinking and ideas are “silent talk.”
   Gelb says that the Behaviourist School is wrong in some instances, that there is not a complete identity of speech and writing, that in the earliest writing, the images expressed meaning without a "linguistic garment." Only after the development of a phonetic system was writing practically identified with speech and lost its independent character. (ibid.)

Monday, April 29, 2013

36. CHRIST'S COMING AS THE HOLY SPIRIT

36. CHRIST'S COMING AS THE HOLY SPIRIT

In what sense was the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost a "Coming" of Jesus?


     The outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, fifty day after the crucifixion, can be construed as a coming. For example, the Jews believed that Elijah was to come preceding the advent of the Messiah, based upon Malachi 4:5. (See Matthew 11:14; 16:14; 17:10-13; Mark 6:15; 9:12-13; Luke 1:17; John 1:21, 25.) In these Scriptures, Jesus clearly stated that John the Baptist was Elijah, so Elijah did come, although embodied as John the Baptist. Did He mean that John the Baptist was a reincarnation of Elijah? No. He meant that the same Spirit that came upon and filled Elijah was that which filled John the Baptist, (Luke 1:17).
     In this same sense, the coming of the Holy Spirit to fill all of the believers, was the same Spirit that had filled Christ when He dwelt upon the earth in His fleshly body. So, in the same sense that Elijah had returned in John the Baptist, so Christ returned in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit. Our essential identity is Spirit; we are a Spirit; we live in a body, and we have a soul. Jesus was with God before He was made flesh, and after His fleshly life, He still lives on as the Holy Spirit.

Opposing Views
     This view is opposed by most Evangelical teachers. I will use the article by Ian Macpherson as an example of the standard, traditional teaching of these groups.[i]
     Macpherson first argues against the idea of realized eschatology which says that Jesus taught that the Kingdom of God had come in His ministry during His lifetime. Macpherson fails to deal with the fact that Jesus did indeed teach this doctrine, (Matt. 12:28; Mark 1:14-15; 9:1; Luke 4:43; 6:20; 9:27; 10:9; 11:20; 17:21; 22:16-18; and many other passages too numerous to mention).
     His second argument has that Jesus’ promise of another Comforter could not have meant His own Spirit. Biblically, however, it must be so, for the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are One God. Indeed, He claimed this identity when He said: “I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you,” (John 14:18). This is in the context of His promise of the Holy Spirit in verses fifteen to seventeen of the same chapter. The Holy Spirit was to be the Comforter and Jesus said "I will not leave you comfortless."
     Thirdly, Macpherson argues that after the descent of the Holy Spirit, the New Testament points forward to the Second Coming. Indeed, Jesus never did refer to a single Second Coming. It is therefore more accurate to refer to His coming as something that will happen often and repeatedly.  There is nothing to prevent the interpretation that the descent of the Holy Spirit was a coming which occurred after His bodily ascension. (Macpherson admits that Biblical prophecy may have multiple fulfillments, p. 7).
     Macpherson’s fourth argument is that the Second Coming was not fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem, (p. 7). Jesus had said that His coming would be during the destruction of Jerusalem, Matthew 24:30, so that should settle it. Macpherson takes no account of Josephus’ record of the appearance in the clouds. He ridicules Thomas Waugh who says: “Actually… the Rapture occurred on that occasion, and … amid the cataclysmic struggles of the time the fact was not noted!” Macpherson concedes however, that the Christians did indeed escape the overthrow, but ignores the fact that their escape, under the circumstances, had to be miraculous if not an actual bodily translation from one place to another. Jesus appeared "in the clouds" in judgment over the wicked city, Jerusalem during its destruction.
     His fifth argument that Christ’s indwelling the believer does not qualify as the Second Coming is no argument at all. He does not deal with the clear evidence of Scripture (John 14:18, 23). This coming was not something that the world would see; nevertheless, He would be manifest, that is, “be revealed,”[ii] to everyone who truly loved Him and the Father:
     20 At that day ye shall know that I [am] in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you. 21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest [reveal] myself to him.22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world? 23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him, (John 14). 
     As Immanuel, Christ is "with us," He isn't gone; He is here, abiding with us, indwelling the believers.
     Macpherson’s sixth argument that Christ’s spiritual presence in the Church is not a Second Coming in that His physical body was not present on the earth after His ascension, (Acts 3:20, 21; 7:55; 9:3). He does not allow for the fact that Christ’s glorified body was not subject to the laws of physics, that is, it was not physical; however, His resurrected, glorified body was the same body that He had lived in and been crucified in. His physical body had become His mystical Body. His mystical Body does not require a physical presence. He could appear in a closed room while the doors were shut; a physical body cannot do that. His mortal body had taken on immortality, and death was swallowed up in victory. He can; He will; and He does "Come" when two or three are gathered together in His name.
     Macpherson makes no notice of the fact that Jesus said it was expedient for Him to go away. Christ therefore taught that His presence in the unlimited and unconfined Spirit was more expedient than would be a physical presence at one particular point in time and space. Macpherson argues that “it seems much easier to believe such a visible, local reappearance of our Lord than His simultaneous manifestation of Himself to His people in all parts of the world!” It may be easier for Macpherson to believe, but that proves nothing about what Jesus said about it. Jesus indeed makes clear that His salvation is available to “whosoever will” when they seek Him with a whole heart. This must be a “simultaneous manifestation of Himself to His people in all parts of the world.”
     In his seventh argument that Christ’s coming at the death of the Christian does not qualify as a Second Coming, Macpherson admits that Christian biography is full of examples of this experience. However, he uses the passage in John 21:20-23 to prove his point. Indeed, this Scripture could be used to prove the opposite, for Christ said: “If I will that he tarry till I come what is that to thee? Follow thou me.” The disciples clearly misunderstood His saying, (v. 23), as has Macpherson, for Christ indeed comes for His Saints at their death.  For example, an appearance or coming of “the Son of Man” was seen by the martyr Stephen, Acts 7:55-56:
     But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up steadfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God, And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.
     Macpherson cites Revelation 1:7 as proof that Christ’s Second Coming will be “a personal, physical, local, visible reentry into human history,” (p. 8). The rest of verse seven shows that it could not be too localized, for “every eye shall see Him.” It could not have been too far distant in the future, for among those who see Him are “those which pierced Him.” This must also be regarded as one fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy, (Daniel 7:13), and of Christ’s prophecy, (Matt. 24:30; Mark 13:26; 14:62).
     There was a tradition among the Jews that:“If they are worthy, (i.e. the Israelites), then he shall come with the clouds of heaven; but if they are not worthy, then he will come poor, and riding upon an ass” (CNT, vol. 4, p. 90). Jesus came to the fleshly Jerusalem poor and riding upon an ass,” but He came to the spiritual Jerusalem, i.e. to saints such as Stephen, “with the clouds of heaven.”


[i] Ian Macpherson, "How Will Jesus Come Back?" in Pentecostal Evangel, February 9, 1975, 6-8.
[ii] Strong's #1718, meaning “to exhibit, disclose.”

This lesson is an edited excerpt from my book Revelation In Context.
My Book is available at the Living Word Bookstore in Shawnee, Oklahoma and is also available online at www.amazon.com  or www.xulonpress.com
 Free downloads are available at www.revelationincontext.sermon.net .

Monday, April 22, 2013

35. CHRIST'S COMING

35. CHRIST'S COMING



1:7. "Coming": “Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth, shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.”
This verse has two direct referents; (a) the phrase “coming with clouds” is found in Daniel 7:13 and (b) the phrase “look on him whom they have pierced” is from Zechariah 12:10. Other passages in the Scriptures also give us more context for interpreting Christ’s coming.[i]
Coming With Clouds
Daniel 7:13 speaks of the “Son of Man… coming with the clouds of heaven.” Jesus spoke of Himself as the “Son of Man,” a title used of the Messiah, (Luke 19:10).[ii] In the context of His predictions of the destruction of Jerusalem, He clearly foretells that the Son of Man will be seen “coming in a cloud with power and great glory,” (Luke 21:27; Matthew 24:30).  The use of the terms Son of Man and coming with clouds brings to mind Daniel chapter 7, which so often serves as a referent to passages throughout the Book of Revelation.[iii] The Revelation, meaning “coming, appearance,” of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:7, is a record of the fulfillment of Daniel’s vision, and the establishment of Christ’s kingdom, as foretold in Daniel 7:13-27.[iv]
When Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, the old, fallen kingdom of Israel ceased to exist and the kingdom was given to “the people of the saints of the Most High; their kingdom shall be an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey them,” fulfilling Daniel 7:27. This completed the translation of the kingdom from an earthly kingdom to a heavenly one as foretold by Daniel.
Revelation 1:7 refers directly to the words of Christ in Matthew 26:64, during the trial of Jesus:
Jesus saith unto him, Thou [the High Priest, singular] hast said: nevertheless I say unto you [plural, the chief priests and scribes], Hereafter shall ye [plural] see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
“Shall Look On Me Whom They Have Pierced”
And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn, (Zech. 12:10).
Here, when Jesus says “ye shall see,” He is referring to Zechariah 12:10, “They shall look on Me.This latter prophecy has been literally fulfilled according to John 19:37; it does not await a future fulfillment:
36 For these things were done, that the Scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken. 37 And again another Scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced, (John 19).
The phrase “they shall look upon me whom they have pierced” refers directly to the men who crucified Him, especially the chief priests and scribes to whom Jesus was speaking in Matthew 26:64. This verse requires that Christ’s coming in the clouds be fulfilled in the generation which crucified Him. It requires that some of these men should be alive when He “comes with clouds” in order to witness, in the flesh, His appearance or revelation. As Jesus had said: “This generation shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled,” Matthew 24:34.
The referent scripture in Zechariah 12:10 foretells that “they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only child, and weep bitterly over him, as one weeps over a first-born,” RSV. These are the ones who grieved for the demise of their fleshly kingship and priesthood. The slaughter of the babes of Bethlehem: “Rachel weeping for her children and would not be comforted, for they were not,” (Matthew 2:18), marked the end of the fleshly lineage of David’s heirs to the throne. Jesus’ miraculous escape marked Him as the last and only survivor for David’s dynasty, an only child, a “first-born.  When He was pierced, “crucified,” those who hoped for the fleshly fulfillment of the promises mourned “for Him as one mourns for an only Son, and were in bitterness for Him as one that is in bitterness for his Firstborn, [or Heir].”
The people mourned not only their kingship but also their priesthood. The legitimate priesthood, descended from Aaron, had ceased to exist because the office had become merely a political appointment by foreign powers instead of the God ordained line of succession. The change of person in the pronouns in Zechariah 12:10, “look upon me” and “mourn for him,” may indicate that they looked upon Christ, the One Who was pierced, and mourned for David whose dynasty and promises seemed to be ending in defeat. 
In one sense of the word, the entire nation participated in and was judged for the crime of their leaders, for the nation ceased to exist as a fleshly nation. In this sense, they were all guilty of having pierced Him, for they had demanded His crucifixion. Yet, those who would accept His grace were forgiven, even as He prayed for them while on the cross. His shed blood became the genetic blood of the New Israel.


[i] See WS at 1:7: “Coming.”
[ii] Also at Matt. 10:23; 24:27, 30, 37, 44; 25:31; Luke 12:40; 17:26; 21:27.
[iii] See G.K. Beale, The Use of Daniel in Jewish Apocalyptic Literature and in the Revelation of Saint John, (Lanham, New York, London, University Press of America, 1984).
[iv] Josephus records such an appearance during the destruction of Jerusalem, (Wars 6.5.3).

This lesson is an edited excerpt from my book Revelation In Context.
My Book is available at the Living Word Bookstore in Shawnee, Oklahoma and is also available online at www.amazon.com  or www.xulonpress.com
 Free downloads are available at www.revelationincontext.sermon.net .